You know, a house feels like the least
financial thing you could possibly buy.
It sits on one piece of land and may
take months to sell. And yet, the money
connected to that house can move around
the world in seconds. You can borrow
against the house. The bank can sell
your mortgage, and investors can buy the
right to receive your future payments.
You might believe your mortgage payment
goes to the bank that gave you the loan,
but that bank might have sold the loan
years ago, which means your payment
could end up with investors who have
never seen your house. The building
stays in one place while the money
attached to it travels everywhere. And
it all starts with a pretty basic
problem because hardly anyone can buy a
house with cash. Now, before modern
mortgages, you needed a lot of cash
upfront, and the rest of the money
usually had to be repaid within a few
years. Many American home loans in the
early 20th century lasted only 5 or 10
years. Borrowers could make payments
during that time and still owe one large
final payment when the loan ended. So, a
family could pay for years and still
lose that house if no bank agreed to
replace the old loan. And the Great
Depression showed just how badly this
setup could fail. People lost jobs.
House prices fell and banks became
afraid to lend. Families who expected to
roll an old loan into a new one suddenly
had nowhere to go. Foreclosures spread
and banks took possession of homes that
were now worth less than the debt
attached to them. So, the government
eventually stepped in and changed the
mortgage itself. The Federal Housing
Administration began ensuring approved
loans, which meant the government would
cover part of the loss if a borrower
failed to repay, and that protection
made banks more willing to offer longer
loans. The new setup also got rid of
that giant final payment. Each monthly
payment now covered interest and paid
down a small part of the original debt
until the balance eventually reached
zero. And over time, the 30-year fixed
mortgage rate became completely normal
in America. It allowed a household to
buy a home with income it expected to
earn over the next three decades. The
buyer no longer needed the full price
upfront. They needed a deposit, steady
income, and the ability to keep making
the monthly payment. Now, this put
ownership within reach of far more
people while quietly changing what a
house meant to the financial system. The
family saw a home and a monthly bill.
The bank saw 30 years of payments backed
by a house it could take if the borrower
stopped paying. That house is
collateral, which is simply the valuable
thing protecting the loan. Now, these
new mortgages helped individual families
to buy homes, but they also created a
much bigger market around housing.
Longer loans made monthly payments
smaller. Government insurance reduced
the danger for lenders, and tax benefits
made mortgage borrowing more attractive.
Put all of that together and far more
families could bid on the homes
available for sale. Now, after the
Second World War, government-backed
loans helped returning veterans to buy
homes on favorable terms. Builders
produced large suburban neighborhoods.
Highways spread beyond city centers, and
millions of families moved into newly
built houses. Owning a home essentially
became part of what a stable
middle-class adult life was supposed to
look like. It also became one of the
main ways ordinary families built
wealth. Every mortgage payment could
reduce the amount owed while every rise
in the house price could increase the
owner's share of the property. That
share is called equity. An owner could
later sell that home, borrow against
that equity, or leave the property to
their children. And this created a
conflict that still shapes housing
today. Someone trying to buy their first
home wants prices to stay within reach.
Someone who already owns a home wants
their biggest asset to keep rising in
value. Existing owners may also fight
new construction nearby because more
homes can reduce scarcity and change the
neighborhood around them. So, the same
system that promotes home ownership can
also reward existing owners when homes
become harder for the next buyer to
afford. Now, once millions of families
depended on housing prices, a large fall
could damage savings, local tax income,
banks, and the wider economy. By this
point, housing was much more than
something that people bought and used.
Now, before we move into discussing how
the mortgage leaves the bank, I just
want to give a shout out to our
community inside the Alux app. These
videos here on YouTube are possible
because of our amazing app community.
You know, the folks really putting in
the work to live a great life. You can
join them for a free 7-day trial of
alux.com/app.
And if you're ready to go allin, scan
this QR code for 25% off your annual
membership. I'll see you on the inside,
but in the meantime, let's get back to
it. So, the mortgage gained the ability
to leave the bank that created it. Say a
bank gives a family a 30-year mortgage
and keeps it until the last payment. The
bank must wait decades to receive most
of its money back, even if it wants to
use that money to fund another mortgage
today. But there's an easy way around
that problem. Sell the loan. So, another
company pays the bank now and receives
the right to collect all future
payments. The bank gets its money back
early and can use it to make another
loan. The family keeps paying each
month, although the company that owns
the mortgage might have changed. Now,
take that idea and do it with thousands
of mortgages all at once. Thousands of
families send in monthly payments and
those payments are passed to investors
who bought a piece of the pool. That
pool becomes a mortgagebacked security,
a product whose money comes from all of
those home loans. An investor doesn't
have to inspect every house or collect
every payment. No, they can just buy one
security connected to thousands of home
loans. Jinny May guaranteed this first
mortgagebacked security of its kind in
1970. Then Fanny May and Freddy Mack
later helped the market to grow by
buying mortgages, setting common rules
and guaranteeing many of the securities
built from them. For a local lender,
this was a huge change. It no longer had
to keep every mortgage for 30 years. It
could create the loan, sell it, get the
money back, and repeat the process with
another family. Money from pension
funds, insurance companies, banks, and
investors around the world could flow
into American home loans. The home buyer
saw a house while the financial system
saw a stream of monthly payments that
could be packaged and sold. And this
brought more money into housing and made
mortgages easier to find. But it also
placed more distance between the person
approving the loan and the investor who
would lose money if it failed. And this
is where the incentives start to get a
little bit messy. A local bank keeping a
mortgage for 30 years has every reason
to care whether the family can repay it.
A lender that plans to sell the mortgage
next week can earn its fee and pass much
of the future risk onto somebody else.
By the early 2000s, a huge business had
grown around producing and selling
mortgages. Brokers found borrowers.
Lenders created loans. Investment banks
bought them. Ratings agencies judged the
finished packages. and investors
purchased them. Every new mortgage
created another round of fees, so the
system kept asking for more. Lenders
began approving people who would have
once been absolutely rejected. Some
loans started with low payments that
rose later, while others required little
proof that the borrower earned enough to
repay them. Banks mixed thousands of
these mortgages together and divided the
payments into different layers. The
safest looking layers were paid first,
while riskier layers offered higher
possible returns. It seemed to spread
the danger around, although much of the
system still depended on house prices
continuing to rise. Rising prices gave
struggling owners a way out because they
could sell the home or replace the old
mortgage with a new one. Higher values
also made weak loans look safer because
the house could be sold for enough money
to cover the debt. Eventually, prices
stopped rising. Refinancing became
harder. Monthly payments increased on
some loans, and more families began to
fall behind. Losses moved through
mortgage securities held by banks and
investors around the world. The
Financial Crisis Inquiry Commission
later concluded that the disaster could
have been prevented and pointed to
failures in lending, regulation, company
management, and risk control. Somehow, a
missed payment inside one house had
become part of a problem large enough to
threaten the global economy. The Federal
Reserve responded by buying $1.25
trillion in mortgagebacked securities
between January 2009 and March 2010. But
by then, the mortgage had traveled so
far that the central bank was buying
products supported by monthly payments
from ordinary homes across the country.
The financial crisis then produced a
strange reversal as millions of
households lost homes while large pools
of investment capital gained an
opportunity to buy them. Foreclosed
homes were showing up at auctions for
low prices just as banks made it harder
for regular buyers to get mortgages.
Large investment firms could show up
with cash and buy quickly. Many of the
first large purchases happened in
Sunbelt cities hit hard by the housing
crash. A company could buy hundreds of
houses, repair them with a standard
process, rent them out, and manage the
entire group with software. Before the
crisis, large firms usually avoided
single family rentals because the houses
were spread across many streets and
neighborhoods. It was much easier for
them to manage one apartment building
than the same number of tenants spread
across an entire city. But the housing
crash changed the math because thousands
of discounted homes went on sale at the
same time. software made it easier to
set rents, schedule repairs, and manage
large groups of houses. According to the
Government Accountability Office, no
American investor owned more than 1,000
single family rental homes as late as
2011. But by 2015, large investors
together owned an estimated 170,000 to
300,000 homes. Detached houses had
become an investment that could be
managed at a large scale. A firm could
estimate future rent, repairs, empty
periods, and resale prices across
thousands of properties. It could also
borrow money against the rent those
houses were expected to produce. Large
companies still owned a small part of
American housing overall, but their
homes were concentrated in certain
cities and neighborhoods. And in those
neighborhoods, it changed to a normal
buyer had to compete against. A family
would now be bidding against a company
that could study thousands of properties
and make cash offers as part of a much
larger plan. Because by this point, one
ordinary house can be part of several
financial deals at the same time. The
family sees a home and a way to build
wealth, while the lender sees interest,
fees, and collateral. Another company
might collect the payments. A
government-backed company might
guarantee the mortgage and an investment
fund might own part of the security
containing it. If the home is rented,
the owner sees a stream of future rent
paid by the tenant. Everyone is looking
at the same building, but each of them
sees a different product. And that is
why fixing housing gets so difficult.
Lower prices help new buyers, but they
reduce the wealth of current owners and
make the property protecting existing
mortgages less valuable. While higher
rents help landlords, but they leave
tenants with less money to save for a
deposit of a home of their own. Lower
interest rates reduce the monthly cost
of a mortgage, but they can also help
buyers offer more money for the same
limited number of homes. Making loans
cheaper can improve access when enough
houses are being built. But when the
supply cannot grow, more available money
often pushes prices higher instead. The
problem is built into the house itself
because a home should be safe, useful,
and affordable. While an investment is
supposed to rise in value, and make
money, when the same building has to do
both jobs, making it affordable for the
next buyer can feel like taking wealth
away from the current owner. The house
is still a home, of course. It just,
well, it picked up more and more
financial connections along the way.
Behind the front door now sits a network
of lenders, guarantees, securities,
funds, tax rules, investors, and public
policies. The building remains local
while the money attached to it has
absolutely become global. We'll see you
back here next time, Alexa. Until then,
take