Skip to main content

[@RenaissancePeriodization] Cold Immersion Is Even More Worthless Than We Thought? (New Study)

· 14 min read

@RenaissancePeriodization - "Cold Immersion Is Even More Worthless Than We Thought? (New Study)"

Link: https://youtu.be/uhwvH6pVDOw

Duration: 13 min

Short Summary

Dr. Mike discusses a comprehensive meta-analysis of 30 randomized controlled trials (527 participants, 2008–2025) finding that cold water immersion reduces muscle growth stimulus when used within an hour after training and does not meaningfully restore strength or vertical jump performance. He declares "the era for cold water immersion" for performance recovery over, noting that partial-body immersion works no better than whole-body immersion, soreness and creatine kinase reductions largely vanish after publication bias correction, and the study population was nearly all male.

Key Quotes

  1. "Cold water immersion does not meaningfully restore strength or jump performance overall." (00:06:20)
  2. "the era for cold water immersion of well yeah it's not good for muscle growth but it obviously I'm doing it for performance because it enhances recovery that era to me is over" (00:11:54)
  3. "Cold water immersion does seem to help some people feel less sore after hard exercise." (00:09:41)
  4. "So, it for sure makes some people feel less sore. It doesn't dependably reduce mechanical damage indicators from a molecular detection perspective." (00:06:21)

Detailed Summary

Meta-Analysis Findings on Cold Water Immersion

Dr. Mike walked through a comprehensive meta-analysis of 30 randomized controlled trials involving 527 participants, with data spanning from 2008 through 2025. The immersion protocols tested ranged from 5 to 20°C for durations of 6 to 25 minutes, applied within roughly one hour after training across a wide variety of exercise modalities—including HIIT, resistance training, endurance running, rugby, basketball, jiu-jitsu, 10km downhill running, and half marathon protocols.

Muscle Growth and Performance

  • Cold water immersion reduces the amount of muscle growth stimulus compared to not using it; Dr. Mike declared that "the era for cold water immersion" for performance recovery is over based on these findings.
  • Cold immersion does not meaningfully restore strength or countermovement jump (vertical jump) performance overall according to the review.
  • When publication bias statistical correction was applied, the reductions in muscle damage indicators (creatine kinase) mostly disappeared, suggesting many of the observed benefits may be artifacts of selective publishing.

Soreness and Recovery Markers

  • Cold water immersion did reduce subjective soreness reports, and one subanalysis found lower creatine kinase, but publication bias correction mostly eliminated these findings.
  • Partial or lower body immersion worked about as well as whole body immersion across outcomes, meaning neither approach was particularly effective for performance recovery.

Practical Recommendations

  • Those seeking hypertrophy (muscle growth) should avoid cold water immersion after training.
  • Peaking athletes like soccer players in multi-game tournaments may still benefit to prevent stiffness and soreness accumulation between events.
  • The speaker could not extend conclusions to local icing or cryochamber, as these were not specifically studied.

Study Limitations

  • The participant pool was almost exclusively male, limiting conclusions for female athletes.

Key Numbers from the Meta-Analysis

  • 30 randomized controlled trials reviewed
  • 527 total participants
  • Literature date range: 2008–2025
  • Immersion temperatures: 5–20°C
  • Immersion durations: 6–25 minutes per session

Full Transcript

Show transcript

Let's say you want to reduce post exercise inflammation. You're not concerned with hypertrophy gains of muscle size gains or strength gains. Well, then get in the cold after your your workout. Do that for one to some people can do 10 minutes. Reduce inflammation. The era for cold water immersion of well, yeah, it's not good for muscle growth, but it obviously I'm doing it for performance because it enhances recovery. That era to me is over. Hey folks, Dr. Mike here for RP Strength and is it time to chill out on cold immersion? Whoa, cool intro, Mike. What? Let's talk about it. What is cold immersion? Other than having to hang out with an aunt that, you know, has no sense of humor. It's pretty cold. You do sports. Somebody tells you that if you get into very cold water and sit there for a while, especially after your workout, especially immersing muscles that you just trained, especially with the goal of improving recovery, that some good recovery things will happen to you. And it's about as simple as that. Cold immersion says you immerse yourself in cold, recovery will occur. Now, you would think that this is kind of some weird esoteric practice that almost nobody does. It seems kind of strange if you just look at it on paper, but it is incredibly popular. Health clubs are getting cold immersion tanks and cryo chambers and stuff. Professional teams of all sports all around the world can't wait to do their cold immersion. People are taking cold showers at home and about a million health hacker podcasters are talking about how cold immersing everything is supposed to give you all kinds of amazing benefits. Now what is it supposed to do in its best realistic cases? Cold immersion like all cold application is supposed to reduce the inflammatory cascade that you get after training to enhance recovery. and thus allow you to perform at the same level that you were before the exercise or close and maybe even improve your mobility. So, it can prevent that tight sore feeling that makes you shittier at sports. It can potentially make it feel that you're not as sore, feel like you're not as sore, which can enhance performance potentially if soreness and the psychology of pain is keeping you from performing your best. And it is supposed to be especially useful in peaking and repaking athletes. If you are a soccer player and you have a one-day tournament where you play three games or a two-day tournament where you play four games, you don't want the stiffness and soreness caused by each game to successively accumulate in future games. So by the time you get to your most important game of the tournament, you're the most jammed up and super tight. So ideally in this case, cold immersion after every single game would keep you looser and more performant such that you get to the last game and you are on your jam feeling not nearly as bad as you would have without actually getting into the cold. These are all potential upsides. The known very wellressearched downside that is pretty much definitive at this point from multiple other reviews of literature is that cold water immersion within about an hour after you train for muscle growth reduces the amount of muscle growth you will be getting over the next several days as your muscles grow and heal. That's a given. We already know cold immersion reduces muscle growth stimulus which sucks. But if you are a powerlifter or a weightlifter, you're training mostly the neurological part of that whole system and the muscles are about as big as you want them in the near term. And if you have to peak or train with super heavy sessions back to back to back. If you are doing jiu-jitsu or rock climbing or anything else, maybe cold immersion can give you a boost in performance where like you don't really care about muscle growth for that workout. Like people don't rock climb to grow their muscles. Maybe if you can cold immerse after rock climbing and go rock climb again, you'll have a better second session. So, it's not all about muscle growth. We just know that's a distinct downside already. And so, there's a downside we know for sure, and that's muscle growth gets reduced. Not eliminated, but reduced. But, cue my favorite meme in the world, Anakin Padme meme. But we know that there is an upside to cold immersion. Right. Right. Scott, real quick, peak Padme and Natalie Portman. Could she get it out of town? >> Oh, come on. >> All right. Just checking to see if you're awake. >> Come on. >> In any case, >> who's going to say no to that? Come on. >> I mean, it would be a very strange no. >> If you say no, I got news for you. >> Yeah, we got some news for you. Um, you Scott, do you remember the uh Phantom Menace, the the Star Wars episode one? >> Sure. >> Okay. Do you remember how she had all of her like staff? It was a bunch of other ladies dressed in uh slightly more uh concealing attire and then she had a like um a girl that looked like her that was like the fake Queen Amadala. >> Everybody every one of those could get it 100%. >> I don't give a shit. Like you know that's not really Queen Amadala. I'm like then do you hear me ask really loud? Do you feel me? You know what I'm saying? Just cuz you're an adviser girl doesn't Anyway. So, let's look at the actual data. We have an amazing new document. A new metaanalysis shows up out of nowhere, bro. Just at the club throwing bows at everybody. It is a massive multi-study review. They ended up with 30 randomized control styles in the good god. 30 randomized control studies, randomized control studies, which means one group goes and does cold immersion and one group does placebo and they tell both of them this will probably help you and then they don't get to pick their own groups and they measure performance after the entire meta analysis is 527 total participants. Man, that that's a lot. That's a big sample size. That's enough to start telling some things apart with some decent confidence. Decent confidence. Most of them were males. So we'll talk about that in limitations a little bit, but this was data that was published from the year 2008 all the way through 2025. That's a lot of data. It is a lot of high quality data. And the cold water immersion protocols in this data set were very varied. So we can't say, oh, but they just tested one type. They had temperatures of 5 to 20° C, which is pretty goddamn cold to still pretty cold. Immersion protocols of anywhere between six and 25 minutes. Scott, are you interested in 25 minutes at 40 degrees Fahrenheit? >> Absolutely not. I'm not interested in 25 seconds. >> Yeah, 100%. 25 anything really. And the immersion depths ranged from just partially like putting in one limb to putting in your lower body to like the entire thing up to the neck because cold water immersion can be systemic or it could be like just immerse the area of your body that you want to cool off in the immersion tank. And now here's the really fascinating part to me of this study. The exercises they tested people in, the modalities, the kinds of working out and fitness that they tested people in performance-wise to see if they could get the degrading performance out of them and then fix it in the cold water immersion were many, many different kinds. high-intensity interval training, conventional resistance training, endurance running, they had rugby, basketball, even jiu-jitsu was in there and a few endurance protocols like 10 kmter downhill running and even half marathon. So basically what we're asking here, what the meta analysis is looking at is if you do cold water immersion within about an hour of these, do your performance metrics come back recovered more recovered than if you did a placebo or just sat around doing nothing? And the performance outcomes mostly measured in this was strength or jump height. It's really simple. You do like an hour of jiu-jitsu or whatever. Then you do like 15 minutes of cold plunge. Then you get out of the cold plunge and they go, "Okay, we knew before you did jiu-jitsu what your strength and your countermovement jump was like, your your vertical jump. Now we measure them again and we measure them in the people that did the cold water immersion and we measure them in the people that did not. And what ostensibly we would be looking for based on the claims of cold water immersion is that the cold water immersion people would still be fatigued from their earlier jiu-jitsu, but not as much. And that would be reflected in the fact that they are stronger and can jump higher than compared to if they didn't do the cold water immersion, which we know from the control group. Now, here's the hammer. This meta analysis drew the following conclusion. Cold water immersion does seem to help some people feel less sore after hard exercise. They reported feeling less sore. And in one subanalysis, creatine kynise, which is a measure of muscle damage, was lower. But when they applied a publication bias statistical correction to this data set, that mostly went away. So we could have made the claim that cold water immersion causes less muscle damage, but we're not even comfortable making that. So, it for sure makes some people feel less sore. It doesn't dependably reduce mechanical damage indicators from a molecular detection perspective. But here's what it for sure does not meaningfully do according to this review. Cold water immersion does not meaningfully restore strength or jump performance overall. And here's a really trippy thing. partial or lower body only immersion work just about as well as whole body immersion across outcomes, which is a fun way to put it because just about as well when you're not working is just about as doesn't do anything. Now, before we really crank on this the poor neck of cold water immersion, let's step back a second and be a little scientific here. This the law of averages. Some people really feel better after cold water immersion and maybe they get performance enhancements. On average, there was no performance enhancement, but we can't say that's not the case for all people. So, if you really feel amazing after cold water immersion, I'm not going to tell you there's a 100% chance it's doing nothing for you performance-wise. And these studies didn't focus on local icing and they didn't focus on the cryochamber. But mechanistically, it's all cold. But we can't be so specific to say, "Okay, cryo doesn't work for sure either." Now, this study group was composed almost exclusively of males, of very few females. Sounds like my Hangouts, which means we can't really conclude that for females, cold water immersion is equally ineffectual as it is for males. Let me tell you guys something that I seriously mean exactly as I'm saying it. the era for cold water immersion of well yeah it's not good for muscle growth but it obviously I'm doing it for performance because it enhances recovery that era to me is over based on this very expansive comprehensive review of the literature and it means that the next time you think about doing cold water immersion for any application including definitely hypertrophy and even sport performance performance, think again. Because if it's growth you're after, definitely don't do cold immersion after you're training. Maybe do it hours later or something if you're into torturing yourself like that. It's a vibe for sure. I get it. But if it's performance recovery you're after, well, cold immersion probably doesn't do that seemingly. So, are you cold plunging because it is an evidence-based thing that is increasing your performance, or are you cold plunging because it's a vibe and you still haven't gotten the memo that it probably does not improve recovery and thus does not affect performance and doesn't help you become more of a spring chicken at your next basketball game. Because if that's the case and cold water immersion actually doesn't work, it looks like the science of cold water immersion just got a bit chilly. I always wanted to do that reporter thing. Anyway, I'm going to go take my testicles and put them into cold water only for psychological punishment, which I deserve. And I will see you guys next time.