[@ChrisWillx] How Male Feminists Ruined It For Everyone - Louise Perry & Mary Harrington
Link: https://youtu.be/zW2WIE_LSuY
Short Summary
This video discusses the "performative male" archetype – a man exhibiting feminized aesthetics and progressive values, possibly as a mating strategy. The speakers satirize this figure as a potentially insincere attempt to appeal to women in a post-#MeToo era, questioning whether it's an evolved adaptation to changing social dynamics or a genuine expression of personal values.
Key Quotes
Here are four direct quotes from the YouTube video transcript that I found particularly insightful or interesting:
-
"Performative males have almost immediately become satarized." This is a concise observation about the quick backlash and mockery surrounding the "performative male" archetype.
-
"I remember discovering just how high the proportion is of male feminists who who subsequently end up being me too as sex pests." This is a very provocative and potentially controversial statement, suggesting a troubling pattern within a specific group.
-
"What it sounds like though is that the performative male adds a layer of like consumerism, which is quite distinctively 2025." This pinpoints a key aspect of the "performative male" as a contemporary phenomenon tied to consumer culture.
-
"...what if in fact they're more evolutionarily fit in terms in the context of what they [ __ ] adapted to the new environment." This presents a surprising and thought-provoking perspective, suggesting the "Labubu male" might be a successful adaptation to modern social and work environments.
Detailed Summary
Okay, here's a detailed summary of the YouTube video transcript in bullet points:
Key Topics & Arguments:
-
Introduction of the "Performative Male" Concept:
- A new trend/archetype characterized by specific aesthetic choices.
- Considered almost immediately satirical.
-
Defining the "Performative Male" Aesthetic:
- Floppy hair
- Oversized, flared jeans
- Tote bag (likely Lubawoo)
- Literary fiction
- Matcha drink
- Considered an elevated hipster or soft-boy archetype.
-
Relating the archetype to past stereotypes and behaviors:
- Compared to women wearing football shirts or Pink Floyd t-shirts (trying to appear masculine)
- Possible modern version of the "sneaky [__]" male mating strategy (implied, but censored word likely relating to manipulation).
-
Connecting the archetype to previous iterations
- The speaker makes note of the link between male feminists who ended up being "Me Too" offenders.
- This speaks to the idea that the performance is a manipulative tactic to get women in bed.
-
Heterosexual Interpretation and Appearance:
- Droopy and feminized in presentation
- HR Friendly
- The "Performative Male" aesthetic is presented as a reworked version of sneaky [__] behavior.
-
Historical Parallels to the 1970s:
- Men embracing long hair, free love, anti-masculinity, and avoiding the draft
- Using feminism and sexual revolution as a means to "get women into bed"
- Feminists at the time were critical of this behavior.
-
Consumerism as a Defining Element:
- The "Performative Male" adds a layer of consumerism (distinct to the 2020s).
- Tote bag and brand name accessories are indicative of this.
-
Evolutionary Fitness Speculation:
- Questioning if "noodle-armed" Labubu males are more evolutionarily fit.
- Adapted to modern work and social environments.
- High-tea aggressive males get "medicalized" and "pathologized".
-
"Post-Me Too" Acceptability:
- Considering the archetype as a post-Me Too reaction.
- Men avoiding appearing domineering or threatening.
- The "Performative Male" as a less threatening, more "HR friendly" persona.
-
Distress Among Progressive Men:
- Some men in progressive circles genuinely feel distressed by "heighty aggressive" masculinity.
-
Book about patriarchy:
- The speaker references a book by an ecological economist discussing care, maintenance, and systemic health.
- The book has a whole chapter about the patriarchy and its impact on gender relations.
- The author's reading of Daphne Demorier's novels as feminist critiques of gender relations.
- Recognition of the ambivalence in Demorier's female characters being vulnerable to and turned on by male violence.
-
Modern Male Response:
- Guys who internalize that to be a straightforwardly aggressive man in a style that could be considered patriarchal is bad.
- Therefore, men must be softer, more consensual, and more Labubu-ish.
-
Potential Societal Impact:
- Questioning if this archetype is contributing to less sex overall.
- The need for more "polarity" (presumably, more distinct male/female roles or behaviors).
Additional Information:
- The speakers allude to past experiences with male feminists behaving inappropriately.
- There's a general tone of skepticism and cynicism towards the "Performative Male."
- The video includes an advertisement for Momentous sleep supplements.
