Skip to main content

[@ChrisWillx] Why We Consume Violence for Fun - Coltan Scrivner

· 7 min read

@ChrisWillx - "Why We Consume Violence for Fun - Coltan Scrivner"

Link: https://youtu.be/vliqUgpGvE4

Short Summary

Action Item/Takeaway: Understand morbid curiosity as an adaptive trait linked to threat learning and preparation, not necessarily a sign of low empathy or desensitization.

Executive Summary: This video explores the evolutionary basis of morbid curiosity, suggesting it serves an adaptive function in threat detection and mitigation. People are drawn to violent, dangerous, and even supernatural content to learn and prepare for potential threats, especially when they can experience these scenarios in a safe, controlled environment. Morbid curiosity is correlated with psychopathy and rebelliousness and inversely correlated with age, but not with disgust sensitivity.

Key Quotes

Here are five direct quotes from the YouTube video transcript that represent valuable insights, interesting data points, surprising statements, or strong opinions:

  1. "Humans can tell a story about something that could happen or something that did happen or someone could tell them a story about something that happened to them. Um, and so we can kind of gain the learning benefits of predator inspection without actually being in any danger. And that's really that's like candy for our minds, right? Like, are you telling me we can reap the benefits of this without having any of the costs? I mean, that's a that's a no-brainer." This highlights the core argument about morbid curiosity being a safe way to learn about threats.

  2. "And so I think what the paranormal domain is really tapping into is an interest in things that are dangerous that we don't fully understand." This provides an insightful perspective on why people are drawn to supernatural and paranormal phenomena, linking it back to the core theme of threat assessment.

  3. "There's actually been a study showing that people find that aspect of the true crime story most interesting. The one where like if a victim escapes, uh what did they do to escape? People find that more interesting than any other part of the story." This is a compelling data point that sheds light on the specific elements of true crime that captivate audiences, emphasizing the desire to learn about successful threat mitigation.

  4. "What kind of violence is a woman most likely to encounter? Probably that from a man as well, right? But not in the context of a war, but in the context of a personal relationship." This offers a compelling explanation for why women are more drawn to true crime narratives, connecting it to the types of threats they are more likely to face.

  5. "People who are morbidly curious were reporting a greater level of psychological resilience. They were feeling optimistic about the future, experiencing, you know, lower levels of anxiety, lower levels of depression, uh, compared to compared to pre- pandemic levels than non-morbidly curious people." This suggests that morbid curiosity may have practical benefits for coping with real-world crises, which is a surprising and counterintuitive finding.

Detailed Summary

Here's a detailed summary of the YouTube video transcript, presented in bullet points:

Key Topics:

  • Morbid Curiosity: The definition, domains, and evolutionary basis of why humans are drawn to dark or morbid content.
  • Threat Simulation: The idea that morbid curiosity is a mechanism for learning about and rehearsing potential threats in a safe, low-cost way.
  • Domains of Morbid Curiosity: Violence, minds of dangerous people (true crime), bodily injuries/body violation, and the supernatural/paranormal.
  • Individual Differences in Morbid Curiosity: Factors that predict whether someone is more or less morbidly curious (personality, age, sex, disgust sensitivity).
  • Adaptive Explanation of Morbid Curiosity: Curiosity balances scales to encourage people to overcome discussions/ fear and lean in so they can learn from the experience
  • Horror as a Genre: Deconstructing horror, and what elements come together to deliver it.

Arguments and Information:

  • Early Interest & Academic Path: The speaker didn't always intend to study morbid curiosity but was always drawn to scary things. They studied anthropology, biology, forensic science, and ultimately psychology, specializing in the topic during their PhD.
  • Paradoxes Leading to Research: The speaker was initially intrigued by the paradox of humans condemning violence while also revering it in certain contexts (e.g., the Coliseum). This interest expanded to include why humans scare themselves for fun.
  • Lack of Existing Research as a Goldmine: The speaker discovered that psychology had largely overlooked the study of why people like fear, presenting an opportunity for research.
  • Domains of Morbid Curiosity: The four domains are linked by the common thread of "threat" – what could harm me and what do I not know about it? The speaker developed a survey to measure morbid curiosity across these domains.
  • Violence: Interest in violent conflicts and mechanics of violence (e.g., UFC fights, street fights).
  • Minds of Dangerous People (True Crime): Interest in the types of people who commit violence, learning what the victim didn't see, and escape tactics.
  • Bodily Injuries/Body Violation: Interest in the causes of injuries and how to prevent them. Crucially, the mind distinguishes between infectious and non-infectious injuries.
  • Supernatural/Paranormal: Interest in things that are dangerous and not fully understood, such as ghosts, aliens, and the occult. This ties into pre-germ theory explanations for disease.
  • Evolutionary Basis/Threat Inspection: Morbid curiosity allows humans to gain the learning benefits of predator inspection without being in danger. Gazelles observing cheetahs are provided as an example. Humans use stories, dreams, and folklore to rehearse threats.
  • Horror genre: Archetypical type of story where protagonist is the underdog, and somehow makes it out alive which is attractive information for people high in morbid curiosity
  • UFC vs. Street Fight: The speaker suggests that the degree of control and safety (rules, low likelihood of death) in events like UFC differentiates them from the uncontrolled environment of a street fight.
  • Factors Influencing Morbid Curiosity:
    • Psychopathy: Higher subclinical psychopathy, particularly the rebelliousness subscale, is correlated with higher morbid curiosity.
    • Sex: Men tend to be more interested in violence, while women are more interested in the minds of dangerous people.
    • Age: Younger people tend to be more morbidly curious than older people, aligning with the idea that it's a learning mechanism that diminishes over time.
    • Disgust Sensitivity: Surprisingly, disgust sensitivity is not strongly negatively correlated with morbid curiosity, possibly because the mind differentiates between infectious and non-infectious dangers.
  • Morbid Curiosity and COVID-19: A study showed that people who were morbidly curious reported greater psychological resilience during the early months of the pandemic, feeling more optimistic about the future and experiencing lower levels of anxiety and depression.
  • Attraction to Serial Killers: The speaker suggests that for some women, corresponding with incarcerated serial killers might be a safe way to learn about a dangerous type of person firsthand. Morbidly curious women are more interested in men with dark personality traits, but are just interested in learning about them.
  • Gendered Content Preferences: Women's interest in true crime likely stems from the relevance of those stories to the types of violence they are more likely to encounter (violence from men in personal relationships). War stories serve a similar function for men (violence from other men outside of their immediate group).
  • Pretend Play: Children are shown to have morbid curiousity.
  • Police Body Cam Footage: Interest in this footage is driven by the opportunity to learn how to interact with police officers, especially in ambiguous situations.
  • Defining the Horror Genre: Horror movies feature a very vulnerable protagonist and a very formidable antagonist.
  • Appeal of Zombie Movies: Zombie movies reliably tap into all four domains of morbid curiosity, making them broadly appealing.
  • Desensitization and Empathy: The speaker's research suggests there is no relationship between empathy levels and being a horror fan. People often assume horror fans have lower empathy, but this appears unfounded.
  • Monster Enters Left: Horror movie filmmakers use a tactic where shocking surprises come from the left side of the screen, which takes advantage of human cognitive asymmetry.