Skip to main content

[@TheDiaryOfACEO] Vanessa Van Edwards: The Conversation Habit That Makes Smart People Unlikeable

· 16 min read

@TheDiaryOfACEO - "Vanessa Van Edwards: The Conversation Habit That Makes Smart People Unlikeable"

Link: https://youtu.be/q2cg1gEYWJQ

Duration: 146 min

Transcript: Download plain text

Short Summary

Vanessa Van Edwards, author of "Conversations" and a self-described "recovering awkward person" who has spent 20 years studying master conversationalists, joins Steven Bartlett's podcast to share research-backed frameworks for fixing what she calls the "connection crisis." Drawing on a 500-person speed networking study, Dr. Dan McAdams' three-level conversation model, and survey data on loneliness, she explains openers, turn-length rules, and self-narrative archetypes. The conversation also covers charisma, non-verbal cues, the "Are you lucky?" question, and the five narrative archetypes that shape how people tell their stories.

Key Quotes

  1. "there was a recent study of over a thousand Americans and they found that 95% of people have worked with someone who talks too much. These chatty co-workers spend an average of 90 minutes of their workday just talking and 71% of respondents said talkative co-workers prevented them from getting their work done." (00:45:27)
  2. "I truly believe a fact is a is a stop sign. A story is a doorway." (00:13:11)
  3. "But a voice note, it's the most selfish form of conversation." (00:00:51)
  4. "And one in six people worldwide are affected by loneliness." (00:44:29)
  5. "Competence without warmth is likely to leave us feeling suspicious." (01:04:50)

Detailed Summary

Vanessa Van Edwards on Conversation, Charisma, and the Loneliness Epidemic

Background & Connection Crisis

  • Vanessa Van Edwards, author of Conversations: How to Connect with Anyone and Make Every Interaction Count (print and Audible editions), describes herself as "a recovering awkward person" who struggled with bad conversation for 20 years before recognizing hidden blueprints behind interactions.
  • She identifies a "connection crisis," introduced on page 5 of her book, in which conversations are getting harder, more awkward, and less satisfying; she frames conversation skills as "career insurance" because people prefer to work with, be with, and date those great at conversation.
  • Vanessa cites that 1 in 6 people worldwide are affected by loneliness and only 3 in 10 Americans socialize daily, partly because future generations will talk to technology more than to humans.
  • Symptoms of being a bad conversationalist include dread before social interactions, feeling overwhelmed or socially overthinking during conversation, and leaving interactions feeling misunderstood.
  • Her 8-year-old daughter independently identified the same two charismatic classmates Vanessa had singled out, validating her charisma definition; she previously lived in Austin, Texas and now lives by the beach in Los Angeles.

Speed Networking Experiment (500 Participants)

  • Eight years ago Vanessa began formal research with three speed networking experiments involving 500 participants and cameras set up in all four corners of the room.
  • Six different conversation starters were tested, with participants rating quality on a 1-to-5 scale after each timed conversation (1 = "worst/most awkward," 5 = "best/I want to marry this person or connect on LinkedIn").
  • The best-performing opener was "What was the highlight of your day?" Other high scorers included "Have anything exciting you're working on?" and "Do you have any fun plans coming up?"
  • The worst-performing opener was "What do you do?" while "How are you?" ranked second-to-last (sixth).
  • "What's your story?" polarized respondents: some rated it a 5 ("most connective thing I felt all week") while others gave it a 0, even though 0 was not on the scale.

Three-Level Conversation Framework (Dr. Dan McAdams)

  • Vanessa's framework draws on researcher Dr. Dan McAdams, who found conversation moves through three distinct levels of increasing intimacy.
  • Level 1 covers general traits and facts (where are you from, what do you do); Level 2 covers "personal concerns" like motivations, goals, values, and worries; Level 3 requires progressively more intimacy and is reserved for a person's "most important people."
  • Going too deep too quickly risks "vulnerability regret," which the speaker describes as "soul crushing."
  • A common mistake is skipping Level 1 and jumping straight to Level 2, which makes people feel the conversation is invasive or like an interrogation; the principle Vanessa offers is "a fact is a stop sign. A story is a doorway."
  • Level 1's goal is described as a "treasure hunt" (put someone at ease, ask what they love, harvest story); Level 2's goal is to give someone permission to share a dream, secret desire, or secret worry; Level 3 progresses from understood to chosen to loved.

Level 1 Questions & Information Gaps

  • Good Level 1 questions replace fact-based prompts with story- and emotion-based ones: "What's your personal passion project?" instead of "What do you do?" and "Working on anything exciting these days?" instead of "How are you?"
  • "Have any fun plans coming up?" subtly introduces potential shared future experiences, which Vanessa calls psychologically bonding.
  • Studying Howard Stern, she analyzed thousands of his interview transcripts and identified his pattern of creating "information gaps" using superlatives like weirdest, most surprising, biggest, worst, and most embarrassing — exploiting the brain's dislike of not knowing.
  • When answering "What do you do," use the formula "I do [blank] for [who] by [how]" — start with a clear label (the what) before explaining the how. Example given: a fifth-grade teacher should say "I'm a fifth grade teacher and I've been working for the last 10 years. I developed this really unique system that speeds up reading" instead of describing a system for "maximizing achievement in young learners."
  • Asking better questions builds a reputation for "hunting for excitement," so people bring stories to you and become callbacks like "Hey, last time you mentioned XYZ, how's that going?"

Level 2 Questions & Dream Building

  • Level 2 covers motivations, goals, values, and worries; Vanessa's mental trick is to know what gets a person up in the morning and what keeps them up at night.
  • The "pet or pest project" framework distinguishes projects a person hopes for (pet) from worries they want to eradicate but are too ashamed to ask for help with (pest).
  • Recommended Level 2 questions include "What have you always wanted to learn?" (triggers growth mindset) and "What is your biggest goal right now?" (time-anchored to birthdays, new years, new quarters, or performance reviews).
  • "Dream building" is the core Level 2 skill: helping someone uncover a secret desire, dream, side hustle, or passion; thinking about goals activates dopamine and motivation.
  • Vanessa recommends placing the five most-interacted-with people on a conversation level to notice patterns; she coined the phrase "fact-checking, not gut-eing" to describe how logical people accidentally shut down conversational depth.

Turn-Taking & Overtalking

  • Based on the Candor Corpus research, the recommended speaking turn length is 15 to 30 seconds; 45 seconds is the upper limit before a turn becomes a monologue.
  • Turns under 15 seconds create "conversational scarcity," meaning the speaker is not inviting enough airtime.
  • Voice notes are described as a monologue, not a conversation, and called "the most selfish form of conversation"; Vanessa admits to sending 9-minute voice notes as an example of how asynchronous communication has become long-form.
  • A study of over 1,000 Americans found that 95% have worked with someone who talks too much; chatty coworkers spend an average of 90 minutes of their workday talking, and 71% of respondents said talkative coworkers prevented them from getting their work done.
  • The "open fish" is a non-verbal cue where a listener opens their mouth as if to speak, signaling they want a turn.
  • The "do you talk too much" test consists of five diagnostic questions; answering "often" to 3+ indicates an overtalker. The "yap challenge" benchmarks are 15-30 seconds (good), 45 seconds (max), and 1-2 minutes (probably too much).
  • Curiosity is described as "the antidote" to overtalking; the test sits at the end of Level 1 because you cannot advance to Level 2 without addressing excessive talking.

Entertainers vs. Appreciators

  • Vanessa defines two types of conversational people: entertainers (who speak longer, want others to laugh at their jokes, share stories, give advice, and gain energy from adoration) and appreciators (who talk less, enjoy hearing others' stories, and are more hesitant to open up personally).
  • She describes herself and tentatively Steven as "appreciators," noting that even after long conversations they have not reached "Level 3" personally.
  • She recounts a green-room anecdote where a "very famous person" repeatedly disengaged from admirers using compliments or questions, until an AV technician successfully engaged them by opening with "Can I tell you the funniest story?" and telling anecdotes about the famous person's movies and sports with siblings.

Conversational Narcissism & Recovery

  • Vanessa accepts Steven's coinage of "conversational narcissist"; such people sometimes escalate through all three conversational levels themselves, producing "verbal vomit."
  • She attributes the behavior to insecurity and a desire to impress, intensifying around people the overtalker finds attractive (including platonic settings with women) and driven by a need to feel understood, chosen, and loved.
  • In a survey of 4,000 people, the greatest conversational fear was awkward silences or not knowing what to say, beating rejection and judgment as options — explaining why people over-talk.
  • The recovery tool is "assertive curiosity": use what/how/why/when questions rather than passive follow-ups like "tell me more."
  • If a conversational bid is not accepted, Vanessa recommends respecting that and moving on, citing the need for "courage to be disliked."

Self-Narratives: Contamination vs. Redemption

  • A contamination narrative = feeling hardship has happened to you and you cannot overcome it, leaving you unlucky and out of control.
  • Redemption narratives hold across work, love, and parenting — people repeat the same frame across all domains of life and have been found to live longer with better immune systems and connections.
  • Self-narratives are changeable through conversation, not fixed personality traits, and can be flipped via safe Level 3 conversations.
  • People "leak" their narrative type through "narrative hints" like superlatives "always, never, everything"; redemption narratives leak positive hints referencing luck and silver linings.
  • Breakups illustrate the contrast: contamination ("the breakup nearly destroyed me, I feel like a shell") vs. redemption ("it made me stronger, I know now who not to choose").

The "Are You Lucky?" Question

  • A quick "yes" to "Are you lucky?" signals high gratitude, agency/control, and confidence — the speed of the answer matters.
  • An ambiguous "I kind of" or hesitation can mean the questioner jumped to Level 3 too quickly or the person feels shame.
  • Dr. Richard Wiseman created an official 10-question luck test; his research links "yes, I'm lucky" answers to lower anxiety, higher extraversion, more relationships, openness to experience, and "relentless optimism."
  • The warning: toxic positivity (telling unlucky-feeling people to be grateful) makes them dig in and feel misunderstood; the recommendation is curiosity — "why? what forces are at play? did you ever feel lucky before?"
  • Vanessa calls herself "kind of anti-gratitude" but pro-feeling-lucky, arguing feeling lucky is more empowering and less "shaming" than gratitude.

Locus of Control

  • Internal locus of control = feeling you have agency over your decisions and how you respond to what happens to you.
  • External locus of control = deriving worth from outside sources like likes, follows, compliments, and friends.
  • Vanessa hypothesizes that high belief in faith or predetermined fate may correlate with external locus of control and worse mental health outcomes; host analogy: a roller coaster (fixed track) vs. a bird (agency, no rails).

Five Self-Narrative Archetypes

  • The framework is described as "more art than science" derived from harvesting hundreds of narratives, explicitly distinct from MBTI/Enneagram because archetypes are fluid (current self-story) rather than stable traits.
  • Ambitious Hero — overcomes challenges through grit, struggles because never satisfied; internal monologue "I got this. Hustle, more, bigger"; risk of hustle culture burnout and burning others out; Jeff Bezos quoted on releasing ideas at a tolerable cadence; Vanessa's self-identified archetype, modeled on Will Smith's character in Pursuit of Happyness which gave her hope at age 18-19 when she was shoplifting food and 5 months behind on rent.
  • Contented Pragmatist — likes things as they are, values habits/rituals/tradition; complements Ambitious Heroes by encouraging them to savor the present (e.g., 3-hour Thanksgiving dinner); suited to stable, traditional, regulated roles.
  • Selfless Helper — defining narrative is giving/service; gravitates to teaching, coaching, nursing, medicine; risks compassion burnout, attracts takers and high-conflict people as partners; parents often flip into this after having a baby; the recommendation is signaling that being understood is a gift to the listener.
  • Creative Disruptor — dislikes rules, breaks systems, countercultural; litigators and disruptive entrepreneurs; example cited is Edward Snowden; often acts as "dream killer" but useful for refining viewpoints.
  • Unlucky Struggler — contamination-narrative type, feels unlucky/stuck/misunderstood; George Costanza from Seinfeld offered as archetype; some of the best comedians fall here because low self-esteem fuels self-deprecating humor.
  • Recommended exercise to surface archetypes: "What book, movie, or TV character are you most like, and why?" — the traits named next reveal self-perception; AI can be used as a practice partner.

Graceful Exits

  • Built on the peak-end effect — people remember the peak and end of an experience more than the middle.
  • Formula = future-cue question + compliment or signaling action (e.g., "Do you have fun plans this weekend?" then wishing well and stepping back).
  • Non-verbal disengagement cues: stepping back, angling body toward the door.
  • Lingering awkwardness is "kryptonite for charisma."

Charisma, Aura & "Riz"

  • Charisma is defined as someone you really want to be around — you want to talk to them, sit near them, work or play with them.
  • 82% of impressions are based on warmth and competence; warmth is signaled first ("I am open and friendly"), then competence ("capable, efficient").
  • Every person is trying to answer two questions: "Can I trust you?" and "Can I rely on you?"
  • The "liking gap" / signal amplification bias — people underestimate how much others like them because cues of liking are subtler than assumed.
  • Trying to be impressive (listing accolades, background) creates distance rather than connection; a research finding cited is "Competence without warmth is likely to leave us feeling suspicious."
  • At a VIP party in Austin, Vanessa's introduction as "a recovering awkward person" — when the billionaires claimed curing cancer and saving Earth — caused subsequent guests to adopt her framing and drew most of the post-introduction crowd to talk with her about awkwardness and YouTube.

Non-Verbal Cues & Vocal Authority

  • Studies show winners physically take up more space (greater distance between ears/shoulders and between torso/arms) regardless of height.
  • Maximum resonance point = the lowest end of natural vocal range; produces stronger resonance when speaking on the outreath rather than holding breath and speaking on inhale.
  • Anxiety tightens shoulders, neck, chin, and vocal cords, producing a "loser feeling" and faster, breath-less speech.
  • People who use maximum resonance are listened to more and perceived as confident and approachable.

Eye Contact & Listening Cues

  • 60-70% eye contact is ideal in Western cultures; 100% is undesirable because it inhibits memory recall and processing.
  • Eye contact triggers oxytocin production, which aids connection but reduces capacity for complex thinking; optimal eye-contact moments are the first few seconds (greeting burst of oxytocin) and when reading listener reaction.
  • A "facial punctuator" is a habitual non-verbal expression carrying no emotional meaning (one friend defaults to a disgust micro-expression).
  • Head tilts are a universal warmth signal because they expose the ear toward the sky; a lean signals both warmth and competence because the listener is physically trying to understand more deeply.
  • Lower-lid flex = universal cue of intense focus (not positive or negative); biologically hoods the eyes to block light and see more detail; the recommendation is to bookmark what was just said or pause for "Does this make sense? Any questions?"
  • Nodding as a warmth/listening cue differs in India, Bulgaria, and Pakistan.

Tools, Behavioral Interviewing & First Dates

  • Vanessa started with over 100 questions and tested them in work, home, and kids' contexts; the framework condenses to nine cornerstone questions.
  • The sixth question in the framework is a bespoke "signature question" asking what you love to talk about; examples include Amy Poehler's "What are you laughing about? What's making you laugh recently?" and Jenny Urick's favorite outdoor memory question.
  • Vanessa advocates behavioral interviewing — e.g., ask "What would your last manager say is your greatest weakness?" instead of "What's your greatest weakness?" — and requests for recency within 2-3 months rather than a year or two ago.
  • She attributes the principle "be interested, not interesting" to Dale Carnegie and research showing the most liked people are those who show interest in others, and the most popular kids are those with the longest list of people they liked.
  • Vanessa challenges single people to stop asking for social media handles and ask for phone numbers instead, arguing Instagram is performative and skipping Level 1 banter damages first-date connection; Steven pushes back, arguing Instagram is more socially appropriate for a stranger.
  • Dating apps are framed as more limited than feeds, typically containing 6-10 images with pre-subscribed questions, defended because AirPods and gym culture reduce in-person approach opportunities.
  • An interviewer anecdote: a candidate two weeks prior shared highly personal early-childhood details in the first 25 minutes of a work interview, forcing the interviewer to pivot from work-focused to counselor mode.

Connection Strategy Recommendations

  • Prep "gift" answers to questions you're asked most often — stories that elicit "me too" or follow-up questions.
  • Example: Jason, editor of Entrepreneur magazine, cannot smell or taste, so he proactively mentions it at dinners and asks companions to recommend what he should taste, producing unusually engaging conversations.
  • Master conversationalists are not necessarily extroverts; introverts often do well while extroverts can fall into "conversational narcissism"; introverts also often go too short on answers and need more time to process Level 1 and Level 2 questions.
  • Have a conversational plan but stay dynamic — dive deep when both parties light up rather than mechanically checking off questions.
  • Bill Eddy estimates that 10% of the population is high-conflict people who thrive on drama, speak in absolutes, see no nuance, and weaponize emotions; they can plant seeds in Selfless Helpers' minds to fight battles on their behalf.

Closing

  • Vanessa passes the overtalker test, while Steven answers "rarely" or "sometimes" on all five items.
  • Steven's closing wish: listeners will go have a "cornerstone conversation" with someone, using the podcast's nine questions.
  • The show's tradition is that the last guest leaves a question for the next; Vanessa was asked about sacrifices she regrets for success, and she shared regret about being away from family when her children were very young and feeling alone as a new mom; she has since moved to be closer to family.
  • The book is aimed at people who dread small talk, networking, team calls, and first dates; teacher reports suggest kids increasingly lack basic conversational skills, attributed partly to AI and computers reducing human conversation practice.
  • Sponsor reads include Shopify (shopify.com/bartlet) and Fiverr Pro (fiverr.com/pro).